Blahggers
The other day I was blog-hopping, and came across a site that belongs to one of those people who believe that all Muslims are Nazis, that all Muslims are out to slaughter all Westerners, etc. A reply I made to a comment left on his blog by someone who was intensely thrilled about the ability of US firepower to destroy Muslims touched a nerve in the fellow who runs the blog. After simultaneously cussing me out and ordering me to not be "abusive", he then edited and deleted my remaining replies. This post is for his readers.
First of all, his accusation that I was trolling for readers and trying to "stir" things up is simply untrue. I write about it here because he is incapable of defending his own thoughts, and deletes anything he's never heard before or personally disagrees with. Had I not left an email and web address when filling out the comment box, I'm sure that I would now be accused of being a troll in that respect as well.
I'm also sorry that your host is so intellectually dishonest, and completely unable to debate like a civilized adult. He would be a better entertainer if he worked out those kinks.
He accused me of spouting "revisionist history", yet could not quote one single example of it. He denied a point I made in my last post - that "Israel" would not have been invented without anti-Arab ethnic cleansing carried out by the Jewish Palestinians. When I provided him with an example of just such an event, he scrambled to justify it. He argues, with this website as his reference, that when "the British pulled out it was clear that the Jews were being thrown to the Arab wolves by them, so a little army of only 600 Jewish fighters got together and routed all those snipers along with 90,000 other brave, courageous, Palestinian cowards." Yes, the first two paragraphs on that site do talk about sniper attacks and the British withdrawal. Unfortunately, your bumbling host didn't read past them and paid very little attention to what he did read. The Battle of Jaffa, in April of 1948, did not take place after the British withdrawal. Had your host possessed an elementary knowledge of this highly-important battle, he would have known that the Irgun fought the Brits at Jaffa, and at times, just as intensely as they fought Arab militants and civilians. Please feel free to use the reference he provided, because it explains all of this. It also explains why the Jews wanted to take Jaffa; there's way more to it than your host will ever care to learn about. None of it matters though, as in the end, just as I originally said, the fact is that there was an ethnic cleansing carried out by the Palestinian Jews. I'm not judging what they did as either right or wrong, just pointing out a fact. The Jews wanted to conquer Jaffa, which was mandated as an Arab possession by the United Nations, and so they attacked. The Arab population went from more than 70,000 to 4,000. That's an ethnic cleansing. Your host was wrong as usual, and you should look into things for yourselves if you don't want to be wrong all the time like he is.
Based on his interpretation of this post, which could easily be considered a defense of Christian martyrs from both Islamic conquest and misguided US foreign policy, your host came to the conclusion that I am a Muslim. We'll just say that his research skills are less than stellar. He also determined that I am a woman, due to my "feminine style of writing" (this "insult" was to be the crown jewel of his retort). I had no idea that he was a trained psychologist. And I'd never heard of a "feminine style of writing", so I looked it up. Lo and behold, a college professor named Mary P. Hiatt wrote a book about it in 1978 entitled "The Feminine Style: Theory and Fact". After conducting a "study of 100 books, 50 by women and 50 by men," Hiatt found "clear evidence of a feminine style of writing which is conservative, structurally sound, logical, and balanced."
Good call, ace.
To sum it up, your host is a half-wit and a coward. His entire presence on the internet is based on the premise that all Muslims are Nazis. Apparently they never really were trying to do that Caliphate thing - they're just trying to bring back European-style nationalist socialism through good ol' fashioned Prussian militarism.
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that vast Islamic fleet to assemble and begin steaming this way with its invasion forces on deck. Our perpetually-impending doom isn't really as gloomy as your pro-intervention, pro-big government, fear-mongering host makes it sound, and would be even more of a fairy tale if our government stopped pissing off the entire Muslim world all the time. I realize that point will forever be lost on your ignorant host, who can do nothing but beat dead horses in his pasture of misinformation. And so I'll simply do what all people eventually will, and forget about him.
Stumble It!
First of all, his accusation that I was trolling for readers and trying to "stir" things up is simply untrue. I write about it here because he is incapable of defending his own thoughts, and deletes anything he's never heard before or personally disagrees with. Had I not left an email and web address when filling out the comment box, I'm sure that I would now be accused of being a troll in that respect as well.
I'm also sorry that your host is so intellectually dishonest, and completely unable to debate like a civilized adult. He would be a better entertainer if he worked out those kinks.
He accused me of spouting "revisionist history", yet could not quote one single example of it. He denied a point I made in my last post - that "Israel" would not have been invented without anti-Arab ethnic cleansing carried out by the Jewish Palestinians. When I provided him with an example of just such an event, he scrambled to justify it. He argues, with this website as his reference, that when "the British pulled out it was clear that the Jews were being thrown to the Arab wolves by them, so a little army of only 600 Jewish fighters got together and routed all those snipers along with 90,000 other brave, courageous, Palestinian cowards." Yes, the first two paragraphs on that site do talk about sniper attacks and the British withdrawal. Unfortunately, your bumbling host didn't read past them and paid very little attention to what he did read. The Battle of Jaffa, in April of 1948, did not take place after the British withdrawal. Had your host possessed an elementary knowledge of this highly-important battle, he would have known that the Irgun fought the Brits at Jaffa, and at times, just as intensely as they fought Arab militants and civilians. Please feel free to use the reference he provided, because it explains all of this. It also explains why the Jews wanted to take Jaffa; there's way more to it than your host will ever care to learn about. None of it matters though, as in the end, just as I originally said, the fact is that there was an ethnic cleansing carried out by the Palestinian Jews. I'm not judging what they did as either right or wrong, just pointing out a fact. The Jews wanted to conquer Jaffa, which was mandated as an Arab possession by the United Nations, and so they attacked. The Arab population went from more than 70,000 to 4,000. That's an ethnic cleansing. Your host was wrong as usual, and you should look into things for yourselves if you don't want to be wrong all the time like he is.
Based on his interpretation of this post, which could easily be considered a defense of Christian martyrs from both Islamic conquest and misguided US foreign policy, your host came to the conclusion that I am a Muslim. We'll just say that his research skills are less than stellar. He also determined that I am a woman, due to my "feminine style of writing" (this "insult" was to be the crown jewel of his retort). I had no idea that he was a trained psychologist. And I'd never heard of a "feminine style of writing", so I looked it up. Lo and behold, a college professor named Mary P. Hiatt wrote a book about it in 1978 entitled "The Feminine Style: Theory and Fact". After conducting a "study of 100 books, 50 by women and 50 by men," Hiatt found "clear evidence of a feminine style of writing which is conservative, structurally sound, logical, and balanced."
Good call, ace.
To sum it up, your host is a half-wit and a coward. His entire presence on the internet is based on the premise that all Muslims are Nazis. Apparently they never really were trying to do that Caliphate thing - they're just trying to bring back European-style nationalist socialism through good ol' fashioned Prussian militarism.
If I were you, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that vast Islamic fleet to assemble and begin steaming this way with its invasion forces on deck. Our perpetually-impending doom isn't really as gloomy as your pro-intervention, pro-big government, fear-mongering host makes it sound, and would be even more of a fairy tale if our government stopped pissing off the entire Muslim world all the time. I realize that point will forever be lost on your ignorant host, who can do nothing but beat dead horses in his pasture of misinformation. And so I'll simply do what all people eventually will, and forget about him.
Labels: Johnny Anonymus
Stumble It!
posted by Johnny Anonymus at 8:43 PM
1 Comments:
Hey good post, im quite suprised at all the interest that little flag think has stirred up, it only struck me as a silly bit of sideline fun.
Kenny Everett used to do a good impression of a US General with guns coming out of his shoulder pads and everywhere, shouting bomb the bastards. To be honest Islam in the middle east is their issue, its only the growth of it in Britain that concerns me. I do think its a sad affair when it comes to the harsh treatment of apostates in Islamic lands, it would be nice to see faith freedom.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home