Minor Changes
Profiles
I also want to thank you, our readers. October has already been our biggest readership month in a year (according to SiteMeter). If you keep reading we will keep posting.
Stumble It!
''We seek him here, we seek him there, Those Frenchies seek him everywhere. Is he in heaven? —Is he in hell? That demmed, elusive Pimpernel.''
Stumble It!
Labels: blogging, El Cid, Ron Paul
Stumble It!
Stumble It!
Fellow South Carolinian and, as I have told her, closet paleoconservative La Shawn Barber wonders today what many bloggers, writers, doers and thinkers wonder - why am I not heard?
If you do not know, La Shawn is well-spoken, succinct writer who also happens to be a black, southern, Christian woman. I say also happens to be but that is inaccurate, she was many of the later before she was the former but I think you get my point. Oh yeah, she also went to law school but don't hold that against her.
La Shawn does not fit the mold, in here own words she calls a spade a spade and pulls no punches on the racial aspect of issues that other folks simply could not touch without getting on Morris Dee's hall of fame list.
I actually think very seldom about issues in racial terms other than to acknowledge that some segments of the population are hell-bent toward looking at every issue in those terms. I suppose I just write all of that sort of people off entirely. Narrow minds of that sort are dangerous and they are plentiful but there is nothing I can do about it.
La Shawn is exactly the sort of person that people in the world ought to listen to. She has obviously had success, her site receives a lot of hits, she appears on MSM outlets from time to time but ultimately, in the big scheme of things, she is a failure.
She has failed to sway the blogsphere in the smallest measurable degree toward a right perspective in relation to important issues. Oh you say she is but one woman and the blogsphere is filled with many voices. That is true, many unenlightened and delusional voices fill our ranks - probably a solid representation of the world around us. There are however, a few opinion-leaders out there - folks that flunkies flock to for their latest ideological azimuth checks.
Why has La Shawn failed? She proposes three scenarios and leans toward the possibility that perhaps, she is just not as good as she believes herself to be. None of her scenarios hold water.
She fails because her message is not what people want to hear. It is as simple as that. If we lived in a better society, with better people that truly understood the relationship between individual liberty and responsibility and the importance of family La Shawn would probably be THE opinion maker on the blogsphere.
La Shawn's story is a cautionary tale for all of us lesser bloggers with ideas that do not fit the mainstream. Do we dare expect to succeed where she has failed? In a name drop world such as ours she has achieved what should amount to success, i.e. links in the right places, name recognition and face time with the MSM. Yet, she still fails to truly change the momentum of wrong ideas.
Faced with such a circumstance some would ask if perhaps their ideas are out of touch because they are simply wrong. Of course we all know principles never change, people do (Stephens). This fact is still true today, and will forever remain true.
La Shawn, there is nothing wrong with you, it is the world around you that is upside down.
Labels: blogging, El Cid, paleoconservative
Stumble It!
We just updated to Blogger Beta and in the process a few things will change (temporarily). We are still a team blog (more or less a tag-team as it has turned out.) When I executed the upgrade command (that sounds official) Blogger put all the other contributors in que until they also upgrade their accounts. Apparently, in the interim, blogger decided for me to place my profile on the right hand column (as if we were just a single person blog).
No worries, Johnny is still with us (and any of our other team members that want to contribute). Once Johnny signs on to blogger the right hand column will be sans my profile.
Stumble It!
Ok - so I understand that comment spam is a problem and something must be done about it to keep the blogsphere functional. But here is the deal - why use the "no-follow" command? Are you a minion of Google?
Here are 16 good reasons that Good Blogsphere netizens ought not use the no follow command.
nofollow does not prevent comment spam nofollow is semantically incorrect nofollow harms the connections between web sites nofollow is not useful for humans, just for search engines using PageRank or a similar technique nofollow could be used to shut web sites out nofollow discriminates legitimate users as spammers nofollow heists commentators' earned attention nofollow could be used to further discriminate weblogs nofollow prevents the Web from being a web nofollow eliminates the dissemination of free speech nofollow was developed in privacy with only search engines companies taking part in the discussion nofollow allows unethical or ignorant PageRank hoarders to misuse trackbacks nofollow hurts search engines by taking away context nofollow allows sites to sell PageRank nofollow is misnamed to distract from the creator of the link spam problem nofollow encourages unpaid labor to clean up search engine companies databases
No-follow commands on your comments - or worse in blog post - say that you are just too lazy to implement controls to stop spammers. If you are big enough to get a lot of comments then you ought to be able to afford simple software to help you manage comments.
It also says - hey I do not care what the WWW was supposed to be, i.e. a series of links for point to point -information flowing via contextual links-a web! Hyperlinks are important to more than humans, most web traffic has a search query in the mix somewhere. If you take away the search engines ability to index links you are in effect shutting the door on information flow.
Google's index is Google's problem, sure they have great spiders that grab and index everything. If they want to serve good search results it is up to them to figure out how to clean things up. If they fail to do that, some other company will figure it out. That is called the free market. You, my fellow bloggers and webmasters are acting like unpaid employees of the search engines - get a grip, dump the no-follow commands.
Furthermore, no-follow commands in no way reduce link spamming, it has just forced spammers to alter their tactics. They still spam hundreds of comment sites in the hope that somebody will click their link. They have other nefarious ways to get pagerank.
The only people that no-follow links hurts is the little guy blogger. No I take that back, it hurts the blogshere. We want bloggers to comment on other blog sites with intuitive and insightful comments - the reward for reading and leaving comments should be a tiny link back to one's blog (a link seen by humans and search engines).
Shame on you slaves to Google's wishes - don't give me the argument that it is your blog and you will do as you please - you are either a good blogshere netizen or you are not and no-follow is bad behavior.
I love Firefox - it has a nifty little tool that shows me all you nefarious "nofollowers" out there. Shame on you.
Read more if you are not convinced and again here if you are not convinced yet.
Update: Yes I know it makes sense to bring some sanity to search engine results, otherwise you search for failure and get this. Unfettered comment links could lead to googlebombing. But again, that is Google's problem to fix, we bloggers need not destroy our web of connectivity to fix their problems.
Stumble It!